Recognition of the Quality of the Firm's Work
- The firm's lawyers have been recognized by Courts, commentators, clients,
co-counsel, and even opposing counsel as a national leader in the area of
complex commercial litigation. Mr. Bolognese has served with distinction
in such cases, and this has not gone unnoticed by the Courts before which he
has appeared.
- Then Chief Judge Donald E. Ziegler of the United States
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, presiding over a
case in which Mr. Bolognese and his law firm served as a Co-Lead Counsel,
observed that "plaintiffs' counsel are lawyers with extensive experience in
antitrust and multiparty litigation," and held "without hesitation"
that plaintiffs' counsel had adequately represented the interests of
their clients. In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation, 191 F.R.D. 472, 480 (W.D.Pa. 1999).
The Court went so far as to observe that "[t]he Court is fortunate to have
the assistance of able lawyers" to address the complexities of that case.
191 F.R.D. at 489.
- Likewise, in approving the settlement of a significant multidistrict
antitrust action in which Mr. Bolognese and his law firm served as a
Co-Lead Counsel, Judge Broderick of this Court observed that:
. . . the Plaintiff[s] were well served by attorneys who were highly
experienced and nationally recognized in class action litigation generally
and anti-trust litigation in particular. . . . . Plaintiff Class counsel['s]
. . . work was efficiently conducted. Counsel diligently developed the facts
and legal issues, analyzed a multitude of documents, were steadfast in
settlement negotiations with the . . . Defendants, and, ultimately,
achieved an excellent result.
- In re Residential Doors Antitrust Litigation, 1998 WL 151804, at * 8 (E.D.Pa. 1998).
|