Standard Iron Works v. ArcelorMittal, et al., Case No. 08-cv-5214 (N.D. Ill.), pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, is an antitrust action alleging that the world’s principle manufacturers of products derived from raw steel including sheet steel and coil products colluded to fix prices at artificially inflated levels, primarily through supply restrictions accomplished through coordinated shutdowns of plants.

In re Verizon Wireless Data Charges Litigation, Master File No. 10-cv-1749 (D.N.J.), pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. We serve as Interim Class Counsel and a member of the Class Counsel Advisory Committee in a consumer class action on behalf of Verizon Wireless customers alleging that Verizon Wireless violated the Federal Communications Act and consumer protection laws by engaging in illegal and improper billing practices with respect to $1.99/mb data charges.

In re Bank of America Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP) Contract Litigation, MDL No. 2193, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, is a consumer class action on behalf of homeowners centering on Bank of America, N.A. and BAC Home Loans Servicing LP failure to satisfy agreements to modify home-mortgage loans pursuant to the requirements of the federal Home Affordable Mortgage Program

In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 3:07-cv-5944 (N.D. Cal.), pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, is an antitrust action alleging that the world’s leading manufacturers of cathode ray color picture tubes, cathode ray color display tubes and electronic devices incorporating them conspired to fix prices at artificially inflated levels.

In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation, Master Docket No. 1:08-mdl-1935 (M.D. Pa.), pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, is an action alleging that that the largest chocolate candy producers in the United States conspired to fix prices in the United States chocolate candy market.

In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 06-md-1775 (E.D.N.Y.), pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, is an antitrust action alleging that the world's largest airlines participated in a global conspiracy to fix prices of airfreight shipping services at artificially inflated prices.

In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 04-md-1616 (D. Kansas), pending in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, is an antitrust action alleging that the world's principal manufacturers of urethane chemical products conspired to fix prices at artificially inflated levels.

In re Online DVD Rental Antitrust Litigation, Master File No. 09-cv-2029 (N.D. Cal.), pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, is an antitrust action brought on behalf of consumers and entities that paid a subscription fee to Netflix to rent DVDs alleging that Netflix and Wal-Mart entered into an illegal anticompetitive agreement to divide the markets for sales of online rentals of DVDs in the United States, with the purpose and effect of monopolizing and unreasonably restraining trade in the market for online DVD rentals.